Trade proposal

    Share

    Guest
    Guest

    Trade proposal

    Post by Guest on Mon Sep 08, 2008 10:15 am

    To Pheonix
    Neil 1.1.
    Vermette 2.7
    Gerber 3.7
    7th in 2009

    To Ottawa:
    Jokinen 5.2
    Bryzgalov 4.2
    avatar
    Cap'n Clutch
    Co-Founder
    Co-Founder

    Number of posts : 13608
    Age : 44
    Location : Ottawa
    Favorite Team : Ottawa
    Registration date : 2008-07-31

    Re: Trade proposal

    Post by Cap'n Clutch on Mon Sep 08, 2008 10:28 am

    They'd never do it but, I'd be all over that one like fur on a Monkey's Scrotum.


    _________________
    "A child with Autism is not ignoring you, they are waiting for you to enter their world."

    - Unknown Author

    Guest
    Guest

    Re: Trade proposal

    Post by Guest on Mon Sep 08, 2008 10:30 am

    Monkhouse wrote:To Pheonix
    Neil 1.1.
    Vermette 2.7
    Gerber 3.7
    7th in 2009

    To Ottawa:
    Jokinen 5.2
    Bryzgalov 4.2

    I thought the idea was to have realistic trades. Not to be mean but in what way is this one even?

    Bryzgalov is one of the best goalies in the West if not the NHL and Jokinen is a stud at C. Neil is at best a 3rd liner and Vermette is yet to prove himself as a legitimate top 6 forward. Gerber is hardly a replacement for Bryz. Maybe just maybe if you threw Fisher in instead of Vermette I'd believe it.
    avatar
    Phoenix30
    Veteran
    Veteran

    Number of posts : 1271
    Age : 44
    Location : Turner Valley, Alberta
    Favorite Team : Ottawa
    Registration date : 2008-08-15

    Re: Trade proposal

    Post by Phoenix30 on Mon Sep 08, 2008 10:35 am

    Dawg's Wife wrote:
    Monkhouse wrote:To Pheonix
    Neil 1.1.
    Vermette 2.7
    Gerber 3.7
    7th in 2009

    To Ottawa:
    Jokinen 5.2
    Bryzgalov 4.2

    I thought the idea was to have realistic trades. Not to be mean but in what way is this one even?

    Bryzgalov is one of the best goalies in the West if not the NHL and Jokinen is a stud at C. Neil is at best a 3rd liner and Vermette is yet to prove himself as a legitimate top 6 forward. Gerber is hardly a replacement for Bryz. Maybe just maybe if you threw Fisher in instead of Vermette I'd believe it.

    I agree this one is far from realistic. Especially when Phoenix just got Jokinen and Bryzgalov recently. Its a shame though that Murray didn't offer Burke the low pick for Bryzgalov. I think our goaltending situation would have been resolved. I do though see Neil being moved this season to a team like Phoenix, Chicago or Edmonton.

    Guest
    Guest

    Re: Trade proposal

    Post by Guest on Mon Sep 08, 2008 11:30 am

    Phoenix30 wrote:
    Dawg's Wife wrote:
    Monkhouse wrote:To Pheonix
    Neil 1.1.
    Vermette 2.7
    Gerber 3.7
    7th in 2009

    To Ottawa:
    Jokinen 5.2
    Bryzgalov 4.2

    I thought the idea was to have realistic trades. Not to be mean but in what way is this one even?

    Bryzgalov is one of the best goalies in the West if not the NHL and Jokinen is a stud at C. Neil is at best a 3rd liner and Vermette is yet to prove himself as a legitimate top 6 forward. Gerber is hardly a replacement for Bryz. Maybe just maybe if you threw Fisher in instead of Vermette I'd believe it.

    I agree this one is far from realistic. Especially when Phoenix just got Jokinen and Bryzgalov recently. Its a shame though that Murray didn't offer Burke the low pick for Bryzgalov. I think our goaltending situation would have been resolved. I do though see Neil being moved this season to a team like Phoenix, Chicago or Edmonton.

    I must have skipped over the realistic part of the instructions.
    avatar
    Phoenix30
    Veteran
    Veteran

    Number of posts : 1271
    Age : 44
    Location : Turner Valley, Alberta
    Favorite Team : Ottawa
    Registration date : 2008-08-15

    Re: Trade proposal

    Post by Phoenix30 on Mon Sep 08, 2008 11:34 am

    Monkhouse wrote:
    Phoenix30 wrote:
    Dawg's Wife wrote:
    Monkhouse wrote:To Pheonix
    Neil 1.1.
    Vermette 2.7
    Gerber 3.7
    7th in 2009

    To Ottawa:
    Jokinen 5.2
    Bryzgalov 4.2

    I thought the idea was to have realistic trades. Not to be mean but in what way is this one even?

    Bryzgalov is one of the best goalies in the West if not the NHL and Jokinen is a stud at C. Neil is at best a 3rd liner and Vermette is yet to prove himself as a legitimate top 6 forward. Gerber is hardly a replacement for Bryz. Maybe just maybe if you threw Fisher in instead of Vermette I'd believe it.

    I agree this one is far from realistic. Especially when Phoenix just got Jokinen and Bryzgalov recently. Its a shame though that Murray didn't offer Burke the low pick for Bryzgalov. I think our goaltending situation would have been resolved. I do though see Neil being moved this season to a team like Phoenix, Chicago or Edmonton.

    I must have skipped over the realistic part of the instructions.

    If realistic wasnt in the equation then I would love the deal but then again I would look to Vancouver instead.
    avatar
    Acrobat
    Veteran
    Veteran

    Number of posts : 1565
    Age : 48
    Location : out to lunch...
    Favorite Team : Ottawa
    Registration date : 2008-08-06

    Re: Trade proposal

    Post by Acrobat on Sat Sep 13, 2008 1:07 am

    Dawg's Wife wrote:
    Monkhouse wrote:To Pheonix
    Neil 1.1.
    Vermette 2.7
    Gerber 3.7
    7th in 2009

    To Ottawa:
    Jokinen 5.2
    Bryzgalov 4.2

    I thought the idea was to have realistic trades. Not to be mean but in what way is this one even?

    Bryzgalov is one of the best goalies in the West if not the NHL and Jokinen is a stud at C. Neil is at best a 3rd liner and Vermette is yet to prove himself as a legitimate top 6 forward. Gerber is hardly a replacement for Bryz. Maybe just maybe if you threw Fisher in instead of Vermette I'd believe it.

    Ok, fine - we'll throw in Hennessy.

    :D

    No?
    And a bag of used pucks?

    Sponsored content

    Re: Trade proposal

    Post by Sponsored content


      Current date/time is Sat Sep 23, 2017 8:42 am