You are not connected. Please login or register

Money for Nothing, except to pay fines

Go to page : Previous  1, 2, 3

Go down  Message [Page 3 of 3]

31Money for Nothing, except to pay fines - Page 3 Empty Re: Money for Nothing, except to pay fines on Sun Jan 16, 2011 4:55 pm

The Silfer Server


Veteran
Veteran
Big Ev wrote:I'm sorry, but do fat women get upset when they hear "Fat Bottomed Girls" by Queen?

This has been blown out of proportion, and it's all because of some woman in the Maritimes who has nothing else to do but call into radio stations to complain about a word that probably doesn't even relate to her.

If it were Fat Bottomed C Word then yes, they would get upset.

32Money for Nothing, except to pay fines - Page 3 Empty Re: Money for Nothing, except to pay fines on Sun Jan 16, 2011 6:29 pm

Bramlet07


Veteran
Veteran
If this song was released today people would be shocked if it wasent censored.

33Money for Nothing, except to pay fines - Page 3 Empty Re: Money for Nothing, except to pay fines on Sun Jan 16, 2011 6:39 pm

wprager


Administrator
Administrator
spader wrote:For the record, if my example of "That's so happy" seems odd, understand that the language police politically correct device filter altered the original word that once meant happy but now is generally taken to mean something entirely different.

We had a Scottish kid back in highschool. I remember I think it was math class, he was sitting there smiling to himself and obviously not paying attention to the teacher. The teacher asked him "Are you happy" to which he replied "Oh, yes, I'm very g-a-y."

Well, that was the end of that class.

34Money for Nothing, except to pay fines - Page 3 Empty Re: Money for Nothing, except to pay fines on Sun Jan 16, 2011 6:42 pm

wprager

wprager
Administrator
Administrator
spader wrote:Without getting too much into this topic, I +1'd BD's original comment because I reacted emotionally to the word itself, as I do to many of the other words mentioned above (beginning with "N", "C", "K", etc). I just want to say that I think I should have taken a second before reacting. I don't care for the conflation of homosexual-specific terminology with negativity ("That's so happy" etc) anymore than I care for female-specific terminology conflated in a similar way. Blah, blah, blah. The point is, I don't know the song; I don't understand the context, and I shouldn't have commented at all.

Rant complete.

If you ever went shopping for a CD player when they first came out, you would have heard the song. In fact, you probably have heard it -- it has Sting singing "I want my MTV" in the background. It was *the* demo track for showcasing CD audio. If you got a brand, spanking new CD player and wanted to show it off to your buddies who were still listening to vinyl, *that* is what they would hear.

For me, it was what The Fifth Element is to DVD.


_________________
Hey, I don't have all the answers. In life, to be honest, I've failed as much as I have succeeded. But I love my wife. I love my life. And I wish you my kind of success.
- Dicky Fox

35Money for Nothing, except to pay fines - Page 3 Empty Re: Money for Nothing, except to pay fines on Sun Jan 16, 2011 7:00 pm

wprager

wprager
Administrator
Administrator
Bramlet07 wrote:If this song was released today people would be shocked if it wasent censored.

I guess you don't listen to (c)rap, eh?


_________________
Hey, I don't have all the answers. In life, to be honest, I've failed as much as I have succeeded. But I love my wife. I love my life. And I wish you my kind of success.
- Dicky Fox

36Money for Nothing, except to pay fines - Page 3 Empty Re: Money for Nothing, except to pay fines on Sun Jan 16, 2011 7:08 pm

shabbs

shabbs
Hall of Famer
Hall of Famer
wprager wrote:
Bramlet07 wrote:If this song was released today people would be shocked if it wasent censored.

I guess you don't listen to (c)rap, eh?
2 Live Crew.

37Money for Nothing, except to pay fines - Page 3 Empty Re: Money for Nothing, except to pay fines on Sun Jan 16, 2011 7:35 pm

wprager

wprager
Administrator
Administrator
Look, BD, I provided a very objective source (Merriam-Webster) which clearly shows there are differences between the two terms. To be perfectly truthful, I don't use the term, and when I played it for the kids in the car I very quickly turned the volume down at the right times (just like I did for Pink Floyd's "Money" and other songs). So I realize that the word is not one to be spoken in "good company"; that said, I don't agree with the decision to censor it.


_________________
Hey, I don't have all the answers. In life, to be honest, I've failed as much as I have succeeded. But I love my wife. I love my life. And I wish you my kind of success.
- Dicky Fox

38Money for Nothing, except to pay fines - Page 3 Empty Re: Money for Nothing, except to pay fines on Sun Jan 16, 2011 7:57 pm

shabbs

shabbs
Hall of Famer
Hall of Famer
Is the term "fag" viewed as being as offensive as "faggot" then?

39Money for Nothing, except to pay fines - Page 3 Empty Re: Money for Nothing, except to pay fines on Sun Jan 16, 2011 8:00 pm

Bramlet07

Bramlet07
Veteran
Veteran
wprager wrote:Look, BD, I provided a very objective source (Merriam-Webster) which clearly shows there are differences between the two terms. To be perfectly truthful, I don't use the term, and when I played it for the kids in the car I very quickly turned the volume down at the right times (just like I did for Pink Floyd's "Money" and other songs). So I realize that the word is not one to be spoken in "good company"; that said, I don't agree with the decision to censor it.

Should you not be happy that you no longer have to censor it for your kids anymore?

40Money for Nothing, except to pay fines - Page 3 Empty Re: Money for Nothing, except to pay fines on Sun Jan 16, 2011 8:01 pm

Bramlet07

Bramlet07
Veteran
Veteran
shabbs wrote:Is the term "fag" viewed as being as offensive as "faggot" then?

Unless you mean a cigarette i would say yes.

41Money for Nothing, except to pay fines - Page 3 Empty Re: Money for Nothing, except to pay fines on Sun Jan 16, 2011 8:16 pm

wprager

wprager
Administrator
Administrator
Bramlet07 wrote:
wprager wrote:Look, BD, I provided a very objective source (Merriam-Webster) which clearly shows there are differences between the two terms. To be perfectly truthful, I don't use the term, and when I played it for the kids in the car I very quickly turned the volume down at the right times (just like I did for Pink Floyd's "Money" and other songs). So I realize that the word is not one to be spoken in "good company"; that said, I don't agree with the decision to censor it.

Should you not be happy that you no longer have to censor it for your kids anymore?


Eventually my kids will grow up. I have to admit, when I was in grade 3 or 4 we went to a museum and some of the statues made me giggle a little. But does that mean that Venus de Milo should have been outfitted with pasties?


_________________
Hey, I don't have all the answers. In life, to be honest, I've failed as much as I have succeeded. But I love my wife. I love my life. And I wish you my kind of success.
- Dicky Fox

42Money for Nothing, except to pay fines - Page 3 Empty Re: Money for Nothing, except to pay fines on Sun Jan 16, 2011 8:19 pm

spader

spader
All-Star
All-Star
wprager wrote:
Bramlet07 wrote:
wprager wrote:Look, BD, I provided a very objective source (Merriam-Webster) which clearly shows there are differences between the two terms. To be perfectly truthful, I don't use the term, and when I played it for the kids in the car I very quickly turned the volume down at the right times (just like I did for Pink Floyd's "Money" and other songs). So I realize that the word is not one to be spoken in "good company"; that said, I don't agree with the decision to censor it.

Should you not be happy that you no longer have to censor it for your kids anymore?


Eventually my kids will grow up. I have to admit, when I was in grade 3 or 4 we went to a museum and some of the statues made me giggle a little. But does that mean that Venus de Milo should have been outfitted with pasties?

I'd say hard-core porn should be censored where children are concerned. I think that censoring nudity (in contexts like that of Venus de Milo) actually causes problems in children. The body isn't something we should teach our children to be ashamed of.

43Money for Nothing, except to pay fines - Page 3 Empty Re: Money for Nothing, except to pay fines on Sun Jan 16, 2011 9:03 pm

hemlock

hemlock
All-Star
All-Star
wprager wrote:
Bramlet07 wrote:
wprager wrote:Look, BD, I provided a very objective source (Merriam-Webster) which clearly shows there are differences between the two terms. To be perfectly truthful, I don't use the term, and when I played it for the kids in the car I very quickly turned the volume down at the right times (just like I did for Pink Floyd's "Money" and other songs). So I realize that the word is not one to be spoken in "good company"; that said, I don't agree with the decision to censor it.

Should you not be happy that you no longer have to censor it for your kids anymore?


Eventually my kids will grow up. I have to admit, when I was in grade 3 or 4 we went to a museum and some of the statues made me giggle a little. But does that mean that Venus de Milo should have been outfitted with pasties?

Familiar with the Catholic Church? They went through a period where they either covered genitals with "leaves" or just cut them off.

The real problem with censorship is where is the line drawn. How many people need to find something offensive in order for censorship to take place? I don't like being called me chief, buddy or especially boss. I find it highly offensive. Can we ban those too? Or perhaps those inconsiderate bunghole who leave a Cussing car length between them and the car in front of them at the drive-thru. That drives me mental. Can we ban that practice?

44Money for Nothing, except to pay fines - Page 3 Empty Re: Money for Nothing, except to pay fines on Sun Jan 16, 2011 9:53 pm

stempniaksen

stempniaksen
Veteran
Veteran
hemlock wrote:
wprager wrote:
Bramlet07 wrote:
wprager wrote:Look, BD, I provided a very objective source (Merriam-Webster) which clearly shows there are differences between the two terms. To be perfectly truthful, I don't use the term, and when I played it for the kids in the car I very quickly turned the volume down at the right times (just like I did for Pink Floyd's "Money" and other songs). So I realize that the word is not one to be spoken in "good company"; that said, I don't agree with the decision to censor it.

Should you not be happy that you no longer have to censor it for your kids anymore?


Eventually my kids will grow up. I have to admit, when I was in grade 3 or 4 we went to a museum and some of the statues made me giggle a little. But does that mean that Venus de Milo should have been outfitted with pasties?

Familiar with the Catholic Church? They went through a period where they either covered genitals with "leaves" or just cut them off.

The real problem with censorship is where is the line drawn. How many people need to find something offensive in order for censorship to take place? I don't like being called me chief, buddy or especially boss. I find it highly offensive. Can we ban those too? Or perhaps those inconsiderate bunghole who leave a Cussing car length between them and the car in front of them at the drive-thru. That drives me mental. Can we ban that practice?

There is a fairly clear difference between buddy and faggot. I'm all for free speech, but a line needs to be drawn somewhere.

I am confused about the timing of this song (being 25 years later and all) but have no issue if the word is banned from radio versions.

45Money for Nothing, except to pay fines - Page 3 Empty Re: Money for Nothing, except to pay fines on Sun Jan 16, 2011 10:03 pm

Ev

Ev
Franchise Player
Franchise Player
To quote Mr. Garrison: "Hey there Dung Dung fag fag, Dung Dung fag fag, how do you do?"

46Money for Nothing, except to pay fines - Page 3 Empty Re: Money for Nothing, except to pay fines on Mon Jan 17, 2011 5:51 am

wprager

wprager
Administrator
Administrator
Too bad that they don't use words like that in ads. Maybe it wouldn't take as long to get the CRTC to act:

The Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) has received hundreds of complaints from the public who are outraged they need to reach for the remote control each time television advertisements appear in order to reduce their seemingly louder volume.

“It is an issue that we are cognizant of and not indifferent to,” a CRTC official told QMI Agency.

An announcement isn’t ready yet but “stay tuned,” the official added.

The Consumers’ Association of Canada’s Bruce Cran called it a “chronic complaint” his group receives.

It's a chronic complaint. Although maybe it hasn't been going on25 years.
http://cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/Politics/2011/01/16/16908776.html


_________________
Hey, I don't have all the answers. In life, to be honest, I've failed as much as I have succeeded. But I love my wife. I love my life. And I wish you my kind of success.
- Dicky Fox

47Money for Nothing, except to pay fines - Page 3 Empty Re: Money for Nothing, except to pay fines on Mon Jan 17, 2011 3:43 pm

The Silfer Server

The Silfer Server
Veteran
Veteran
wprager wrote:Look, BD, I provided a very objective source (Merriam-Webster) which clearly shows there are differences between the two terms. To be perfectly truthful, I don't use the term, and when I played it for the kids in the car I very quickly turned the volume down at the right times (just like I did for Pink Floyd's "Money" and other songs). So I realize that the word is not one to be spoken in "good company"; that said, I don't agree with the decision to censor it.

The problem with using an objective source like Merriam Webster is that they are a dictionary, and they deal with words, not with sociology, anthropology, and people. But if that's not enough for you the American Heritage Dictionary says the word "faggot" is disparaging and offensive. MSN Encarta defines the word as "an offensive term for a happy man". Cambridge American English dictionary, as well as their Advanced Learner's dictionary, states that "faggot" is an offensive word. The Oxford Advanced Learner's as the word "faggot" as an "offensive word for a male homosexual." All of these are objective sources, which shows that yes, this word is offensive.

And even if one were to use Merriam-Webster as the end all of the discussion, I don't believe in waiting around and keeping a word public until it becomes offensive according to them. You know the word N***** was once widely accepted. In 1939, Agatha Christie's book And Then There were None was originally entitled Ten Little N*****s.

What I don't seem to understand is why you are supporting the use of a word that has become highly offensive to homosexuals. I have friends who have been called that, and it's pretty powerful stuff. It is offensive. This I'm telling you. Now if you would rather not pay attention to that at all, and continue the support the use of it (by others, not yourself) because Merriam Webster says it's not offensive, then that's your decision.

48Money for Nothing, except to pay fines - Page 3 Empty Re: Money for Nothing, except to pay fines on Tue Jan 25, 2011 10:14 am

Bramlet07

Bramlet07
Veteran
Veteran
Now the Government(CRTC) is asking them to reconsider the ruling, and why some people in radio dont like that.

http://exploremusic.com/wtf/so-the-crtc-asks-the-cbsc-to-reconsider-money-for-nothing-decision-this-bothers-me-a-lot/

Sponsored content


Back to top  Message [Page 3 of 3]

Go to page : Previous  1, 2, 3

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum