Vermette for Leclaire?

Phoenix30 wrote:Agreed,

Leclaire comes with 2 years remaining. If Murray moved Kelly and Auld in a deal for Leclaire and say a prospect or pick then I think it works for both teams.

Moving Kelly and Auld free up about 3.2 mil while we take in 3.8 but we lose the extra year on Kellys contract. Elliott then can be easied into the starters role while gaining experience behind LeClaire and take over in 2 years when LeClaire is a UFA. Now another thing to remember is that this would be a fresh start for LeClaire and he would want to come out a guns a blazing to show he deserves to be a #1 next season and then would need to play even harder in his contract year. I think its worth a risk unless there is another quality goalie out there. As well, Elliott still needs to get resigned for next season anyways and who knows how those negotiatons are going.

This is the problem. We might need a goalie but there aren't many good ones going around atm and they aren't cheap to boot.

If a young, talented goalie became available then it's something you definitely have to look at and Leclaire is no exception.

Urkie wrote:The reason I'm high on this is because I'm thinking about the possibility of Elliott not panning out. I realize that he's only a rookie and so forth but what happens if he doesn't turn out to be the guy we need? Murray has to have a backup plan because he knows if this team doesn't make the playoffs next year then he's history. Leaving his job in the hands of an untested 24 year old rookie goalie may not be something he wants to do.

There's definitely a possibility that Elliot doesn't pan out, but there's also a really strong indication that he will. For once this organization needs to stick with a plan in goal - and that guy has to be Elliot. Even before The Hockey News list of prospects came out, I think we've all been shown what he can do. Has he blown us away? Not yet, but neither did Schneider in Vancouver and neither do many young goalies first entering the NHL. Especially when the kid is coming into this mess of a team we have.

There's really only a technical to achieve in Bingo - and that's winning a championship. He's done everything else in the AHL that can be done, now it's time to get him in there as a back-up full time. If Leclaire had one more year left at 3.8, then perhaps I'd be excited, but he has two more - and Elliot will have surpassed him by then IMO.

Not to mention that we should probably give credit where it's due. Auld has a 2.44 and a .913 in 33 games this season. If we can hand Auld 50 starts and have Elliot get the other 30, I would bet good $$ that both guys would have a combined GAA in the 2.50 range and a save % of around .912. Auld got burnt out earlier this year, but with a guy who can take every 3rd start, I can see him turning in a good year - ditto Elliot as his back-up. Then you can move Elliot into the 50-60 start range the year after. If something goes radically wrong, then you move on the free agency market next summer, but don't make a move now - especially not when you've invested so much time on Elliot.

Leclaire is injury prone and expensive. He's had one good season.

It's a tremendous risk. Don't act like this will necessarily "solve" our goaltending issue.

I'm more comfortable with Elliott than I would be with Leclaire.

504Heater wrote:

Urkie wrote:The reason I'm high on this is because I'm thinking about the possibility of Elliott not panning out. I realize that he's only a rookie and so forth but what happens if he doesn't turn out to be the guy we need? Murray has to have a backup plan because he knows if this team doesn't make the playoffs next year then he's history. Leaving his job in the hands of an untested 24 year old rookie goalie may not be something he wants to do.

There's definitely a possibility that Elliot doesn't pan out, but there's also a really strong indication that he will. For once this organization needs to stick with a plan in goal - and that guy has to be Elliot. Even before The Hockey News list of prospects came out, I think we've all been shown what he can do. Has he blown us away? Not yet, but neither did Schneider in Vancouver and neither do many young goalies first entering the NHL. Especially when the kid is coming into this mess of a team we have.

There's really only a technical to achieve in Bingo - and that's winning a championship. He's done everything else in the AHL that can be done, now it's time to get him in there as a back-up full time. If Leclaire had one more year left at 3.8, then perhaps I'd be excited, but he has two more - and Elliot will have surpassed him by then IMO.

Not to mention that we should probably give credit where it's due. Auld has a 2.44 and a .913 in 33 games this season. If we can hand Auld 50 starts and have Elliot get the other 30, I would bet good $$ that both guys would have a combined GAA in the 2.50 range and a save % of around .912. Auld got burnt out earlier this year, but with a guy who can take every 3rd start, I can see him turning in a good year - ditto Elliot as his back-up. Then you can move Elliot into the 50-60 start range the year after. If something goes radically wrong, then you move on the free agency market next summer, but don't make a move now - especially not when you've invested so much time on Elliot.

Actually LeClaire has 2 years left after the end of this season. You could bring him in for 1 year with Elliott backs him up then move him after the 2009/10 season. A team maybe willing to trade for him with only 1 year left on his contract by then.

asq2 wrote:Leclaire is injury prone and expensive. He's had one good season.

It's a tremendous risk. Don't act like this will necessarily "solve" our goaltending issue.

I'm more comfortable with Elliott than I would be with Leclaire.

I'm not saying Leclaire will solve our goaltending issues. All I'm saying is that Murray is going to be trying to put a team together that can get us into the playoffs. That's his primary goal for next season. If Elliott doesn't improve over the next 2 months then do you really think he's going to go with him next season? He's gotta have a backup plan in case Elliott just isn't ready.

Phoenix30 wrote:Actually LeClaire has 2 years left after the end of this season. You could bring him in for 1 year with Elliott backs him up then move him after the 2009/10 season. A team maybe willing to trade for him with only 1 year left on his contract by then.

Yeah, I fixed that at the last second.

Why not spend that 3.8 (as well as the money we free up) on our defence. I think that has the potential to win us some games next year if we retool it.

I can see where you'd want to upgrade the G, but why not beat down some doors in the summer (if your really feel it's needed) and try to acquire someone like Vokoun (to use an example).

If Florida was to re-sign Anderson to an attractive package, maybe they feel the need to move Vokoun.

Or Anaheim with Giguere being pressured by Hillier.

Or Backstrom (6 million though I'm sure) being pressured by Harding.

Or Ellis from Nashville (not sold).

Or sign Khabby to a one year, 4 million.

Any of these excites me more than Leclaire to be honest.

Even Fernandez, who was apparently a real arse in Minny would look good here for a year, but I'm sure he gets a long term somewhere.

504Heater wrote:There's definitely a possibility that Elliot doesn't pan out, but there's also a really strong indication that he will. For once this organization needs to stick with a plan in goal - and that guy has to be Elliot. Even before The Hockey News list of prospects came out, I think we've all been shown what he can do. Has he blown us away? Not yet, but neither did Schneider in Vancouver and neither do many young goalies first entering the NHL. Especially when the kid is coming into this mess of a team we have.

There's really only a technical to achieve in Bingo - and that's winning a championship. He's done everything else in the AHL that can be done, now it's time to get him in there as a back-up full time. If Leclaire had one more year left at 3.8, then perhaps I'd be excited, but he has two more - and Elliot will have surpassed him by then IMO.

Not to mention that we should probably give credit where it's due. Auld has a 2.44 and a .913 in 33 games this season. If we can hand Auld 50 starts and have Elliot get the other 30, I would bet good $$ that both guys would have a combined GAA in the 2.50 range and a save % of around .912. Auld got burnt out earlier this year, but with a guy who can take every 3rd start, I can see him turning in a good year - ditto Elliot as his back-up. Then you can move Elliot into the 50-60 start range the year after. If something goes radically wrong, then you move on the free agency market next summer, but don't make a move now - especially not when you've invested so much time on Elliot.

I'm not saying I want this to happen right now and Murray may not either. Columbus is the team that's pushing hard right now to add Vermette for their playoff run. If Murray is smart, he can drive up the price and steal Leclaire and a draft pick away from Columbus on Wednesday.

It's all about making the playoffs though. Murray knows you need a solid goalie to get back into the playoffs and if there is any doubt about Elliott then he's going to look elsewhere this summer if he doesn't add anything before the deadline.

Urkie wrote:
I'm not saying I want this to happen right now and Murray may not either. Columbus is the team that's pushing hard right now to add Vermette for their playoff run. If Murray is smart, he can drive up the price and steal Leclaire and a draft pick away from Columbus on Wednesday.

It's all about making the playoffs though. Murray knows you need a solid goalie to get back into the playoffs and if there is any doubt about Elliott then he's going to look elsewhere this summer if he doesn't add anything before the deadline.

Good points. If the Sens are struggling in goal by December of next year, I would expect a blockbusting deal for a high priced goaltender. He'll give them at least that long IMO, but yeah, I can potentially see him doing something by deadline next year (summer if he gets an offer he can't refuse).

Kris Russell and a 2nd rounder for Vermette - and I'm on happy street. Well...not really, I like Vermette a lot now and would rather keep him, but I'd be happy.

504Heater wrote:

Phoenix30 wrote:Actually LeClaire has 2 years left after the end of this season. You could bring him in for 1 year with Elliott backs him up then move him after the 2009/10 season. A team maybe willing to trade for him with only 1 year left on his contract by then.

Yeah, I fixed that at the last second.

Why not spend that 3.8 (as well as the money we free up) on our defence. I think that has the potential to win us some games next year if we retool it.

I can see where you'd want to upgrade the G, but why not beat down some doors in the summer (if your really feel it's needed) and try to acquire someone like Vokoun (to use an example).

If Florida was to re-sign Anderson to an attractive package, maybe they feel the need to move Vokoun.

Or Anaheim with Giguere being pressured by Hillier.

Or Backstrom (6 million though I'm sure) being pressured by Harding.

Or Ellis from Nashville (not sold).

Or sign Khabby to a one year, 4 million.

Any of these excites me more than Leclaire to be honest.

Alot of those guys are high priced guys limiting your ability to put money in your defence. Knabby would be the only one I would entertain. I like Leclaire because he is still young with lots of potential.

504Heater wrote:Good points. If the Sens are struggling in goal by December of next year, I would expect a blockbusting deal for a high priced goaltender. He'll give them at least that long IMO, but yeah, I can potentially see him doing something by deadline next year (summer if he gets an offer he can't refuse).

Kris Russell and a 2nd rounder for Vermette - and I'm on happy street. Well...not really, I like Vermette a lot now and would rather keep him, but I'd be happy.

I'd expect Murray to address the goaltending before training camp at least. He even said it himself, you make your big adjustments during the off-season.

In reality the big picture is not that clear, a lot of things are very much up in the air. A lot of players are being evaluated and things are not all set in stone. Murray said a few days ago that there are no untouchables and at this point that's the right mentality imo. If you can do something that improves your team you do it because these players haven't done much over the last year and a half to be called untouchables (I'm referring to the core here).

504Heater wrote:

Urkie wrote:The reason I'm high on this is because I'm thinking about the possibility of Elliott not panning out. I realize that he's only a rookie and so forth but what happens if he doesn't turn out to be the guy we need? Murray has to have a backup plan because he knows if this team doesn't make the playoffs next year then he's history. Leaving his job in the hands of an untested 24 year old rookie goalie may not be something he wants to do.

There's definitely a possibility that Elliot doesn't pan out, but there's also a really strong indication that he will. For once this organization needs to stick with a plan in goal - and that guy has to be Elliot. Even before The Hockey News list of prospects came out, I think we've all been shown what he can do. Has he blown us away? Not yet, but neither did Schneider in Vancouver and neither do many young goalies first entering the NHL. Especially when the kid is coming into this mess of a team we have.

In sticking to its plan, the organization has to develop the goalie properly. This doesn't mean platooning the rookie/sophomore with a goalie that has "Career Backup" tatooed on his forehead.

I agree that Elliott looks like the real deal, but there have been lots of first-round picks that looked like the real deal, and ended up doing the "crash-and-burn". It would be imprudent of Murray to not prepare for the season after next, and getting "The Grinch" would nicely do that.

Towards the end of 2010/11, when Elliott has proven himself nicely, and if Ottawa is not a solid contender, then LeClaire can be moved to a contender for picks (or to a bottom feeder, after the season, depending on the situation). In the meantime, Ottawa has two young, generally solid goalies who can drive each other, and they've upgraded (significantly) the play in the crease for a total of about $5m, representing about 8-12% of the total cap hit after projected reduction (depending on final numbers).

504Heater wrote:There's really only a technical to achieve in Bingo - and that's winning a championship. He's done everything else in the AHL that can be done, now it's time to get him in there as a back-up full time. If Leclaire had one more year left at 3.8, then perhaps I'd be excited, but he has two more - and Elliot will have surpassed him by then IMO.

What if he hasn't? Can Murray count on Auld to carry the team?
Or if Elliott is injured - can Auld carry the team for an extended stretch?

I'd argue that LeClaire is better insurance, and would work better in a 1a/1b scenario.

504Heater wrote:Not to mention that we should probably give credit where it's due. Auld has a 2.44 and a .913 in 33 games this season. If we can hand Auld 50 starts and have Elliot get the other 30, I would bet good $$ that both guys would have a combined GAA in the 2.50 range and a save % of around .912. Auld got burnt out earlier this year, but with a guy who can take every 3rd start, I can see him turning in a good year - ditto Elliot as his back-up. Then you can move Elliot into the 50-60 start range the year after. If something goes radically wrong, then you move on the free agency market next summer, but don't make a move now - especially not when you've invested so much time on Elliot.

This is his pattern on every team he's been on. He's a good goalie, just not what I see as the better of the two options.

There's nothing stopping Murray from moving for a UFA next summer irrespective of what happens - you can go over the cap by 10% signing FAs as long as you are back under by training camp. Moving LeClaire won't be hard, given his prior record (although to be fair, I would have thought that about Emery and Gerber, and Bryzgalov from a few yrs ago...)

There is no market for Goalies right now. Vermette for Leclaire could be done in the summer if BM wants to. If Columbus really wants Vermette for the playoff run it is going to cost more than an expensive, injured backup. Everyone please stop with the Kris Russell, BM picked up Campoli so I would imagine he is no longer interested in Russell.

504Heater wrote:

Urkie wrote:The reason I'm high on this is because I'm thinking about the possibility of Elliott not panning out. I realize that he's only a rookie and so forth but what happens if he doesn't turn out to be the guy we need? Murray has to have a backup plan because he knows if this team doesn't make the playoffs next year then he's history. Leaving his job in the hands of an untested 24 year old rookie goalie may not be something he wants to do.

There's definitely a possibility that Elliot doesn't pan out, but there's also a really strong indication that he will. For once this organization needs to stick with a plan in goal - and that guy has to be Elliot. Even before The Hockey News list of prospects came out, I think we've all been shown what he can do. Has he blown us away? Not yet, but neither did Schneider in Vancouver and neither do many young goalies first entering the NHL. Especially when the kid is coming into this mess of a team we have.

There's really only a technical to achieve in Bingo - and that's winning a championship. He's done everything else in the AHL that can be done, now it's time to get him in there as a back-up full time. If Leclaire had one more year left at 3.8, then perhaps I'd be excited, but he has two more - and Elliot will have surpassed him by then IMO.

Not to mention that we should probably give credit where it's due. Auld has a 2.44 and a .913 in 33 games this season. If we can hand Auld 50 starts and have Elliot get the other 30, I would bet good $$ that both guys would have a combined GAA in the 2.50 range and a save % of around .912. Auld got burnt out earlier this year, but with a guy who can take every 3rd start, I can see him turning in a good year - ditto Elliot as his back-up. Then you can move Elliot into the 50-60 start range the year after. If something goes radically wrong, then you move on the free agency market next summer, but don't make a move now - especially not when you've invested so much time on Elliot.

Sorry Heater, Auld could never handle 50 games at this level. He couldn't do 50 for the Moose when I was in Winnipeg.

Urkie, good defence of your position. I agree that Elliot has too many ?? marks right now. Ottawa needs someone proven in nets for the next couple. I just don't think it's Leclaire. I really cannot trust it to someone with a wonky ankle.

Backstrom, Khabibulin or Thomas.

And yes, you will have to pay a lot for the privilege for any of them to come. But they will bring stability that Ottawa has not had since pre-injured Hasek

RobbyJ wrote:There is no market for Goalies right now. Vermette for Leclaire could be done in the summer if BM wants to. If Columbus really wants Vermette for the playoff run it is going to cost more than an expensive, injured backup. Everyone please stop with the Kris Russell, BM picked up Campoli so I would imagine he is no longer interested in Russell.

I agree Robby, Vermette is at the top of his value right now and will only get higher. If teams really want this guy, we are either talking a mid level prospect plus a non first round pick (maybe I am really overvaluing Vermette, but if someone gives it, why not?)

Vermette does have some scoring tough, top face off guy and kills penalties.

I say we make a play for Backstrom, I think a 3 year 14M could get it done. I just don't see anywhere else other than Toronto that has a combination of Need/Cap Space to make it happen.

RobbyJ wrote:I say we make a play for Backstrom, I think a 3 year 14M could get it done. I just don't see anywhere else other than Toronto that has a combination of Need/Cap Space to make it happen.

Hopefully that one wouldn't end up in a bust, but honestly, Ottawa needs some stability in goal, was definitely behind Elliott, however, he did look pretty bad against Toronto. Does that mean his time is over in Ottawa, no of course not, listening to Neely is allowing me to be more patient with Elliott, saying that Brian has won at every level he has played at and he has the drive of a winner, that is good enough for me, we need more attitudes like that in the dressing room. Hopefully it's contagious.

I don't like Leclaires save percentage, in particular. I think everyone knows where I stand on Vermette.

SeawaySensFan wrote:I don't like Leclaires save percentage, in particular. I think everyone knows where I stand on Vermette.

We all know you have a serious man-crush on Vermie, he's just so delicious lol.

RobbyJ wrote:There is no market for Goalies right now. Vermette for Leclaire could be done in the summer if BM wants to. If Columbus really wants Vermette for the playoff run it is going to cost more than an expensive, injured backup. Everyone please stop with the Kris Russell, BM picked up Campoli so I would imagine he is no longer interested in Russell.

He's only just begun to revamp this crappy D, Russell is really, really good. I betcha he's going for him as well.

504Heater wrote:

RobbyJ wrote:There is no market for Goalies right now. Vermette for Leclaire could be done in the summer if BM wants to. If Columbus really wants Vermette for the playoff run it is going to cost more than an expensive, injured backup. Everyone please stop with the Kris Russell, BM picked up Campoli so I would imagine he is no longer interested in Russell.

He's only just begun to revamp this crappy D, Russell is really, really good. I betcha he's going for him as well.

well if we are throwing in Russell, hell, let's get Hamhuis too, now if you had to pick between the two, Hamhuis or Russel? I believe someone around here said too that Karlsson (Eric) was making the jump to North America next year as well.

SensFan71 wrote:

SeawaySensFan wrote:I don't like Leclaires save percentage, in particular. I think everyone knows where I stand on Vermette.

We all know you have a serious man-crush on Vermie, he's just so delicious lol.

If I were prone to man-crushing, Mike Fisher would be my favorite player. And I'd have to change my name to Goodie Wilson.

SeawaySensFan wrote:

SensFan71 wrote:

SeawaySensFan wrote:I don't like Leclaires save percentage, in particular. I think everyone knows where I stand on Vermette.

We all know you have a serious man-crush on Vermie, he's just so delicious lol.

If I were prone to man-crushing, Mike Fisher would be my favorite player. And I'd have to change my name to Goodie Wilson.

and at that point, you would be starting a feud with Carrie Underwood for his affection, oh the drama lol.

I'm a leclaire fan, but this trade stinks for ottawa. We lose one our only legitimate 2nd line guys who also dominates face offs and kills penalties. We gain something we already have. A goalie with potential. But injury prone with a big price tag. Upgrade d first. If you upgrade goal you better get a proven guy, not a question mark.

I really hope Murray doesn't touch Leclaire. He would be just another average goalie in Ottawa. I think Backstrom is the way to go on July 1st.

Mojo wrote:I really hope Murray doesn't touch Leclaire. He would be just another average goalie in Ottawa. I think Backstrom is the way to go on July 1st.

Not sold on Backstrom either. At one point Harding was threatening his job. He's going to be over paid. Do we want to over pay in goal again after the Gerber fiasco?

SensFan71 wrote:
well if we are throwing in Russell, hell, let's get Hamhuis too, now if you had to pick between the two, Hamhuis or Russel? I believe someone around here said too that Karlsson (Eric) was making the jump to North America next year as well.

Hamhuis is twice the D-man Russell is IMO, but Russell has the goods too. If we could get Hamhuis, we'd be on the way back to respectability.

Cap'n Clutch wrote:Not sold on Backstrom either. At one point Harding was threatening his job. He's going to be over paid. Do we want to over pay in goal again after the Gerber fiasco?

If we're gonna do this, then do it right IMO. Backstrom is an elite goalie, even in a defensive system like Minny's, he's awesome.

I would applaud offering Backstrom 4 x 4.5 - 5.0 million

Highest paid goalie in Sens history I think, but he's only 30, entering his prime as a goaltender. Other than Hasek, would be the highest profile goalie Ottawa would have ever had.

Jesus, I dont get people... people in Ottawa are willing to wait 7 year for Spezza to come around in Ottawa, but they are not willing to wait less than 6 months for a top goaltending prospect to try and be the number 1 guy.

Ottawa always tried to short term fix with goaltending and what happens? Gerber, Hasek... Do it right, develope your number 1 guy during a REBUILD year, which next year defently is, the playoffs are still a long shot.

For once it looks like Ottawa is going to handle their goaltending situation correctly.

beedub wrote:I would applaud offering Backstrom 4 x 4.5 - 5.0 million

Highest paid goalie in Sens history I think, but he's only 30, entering his prime as a goaltender. Other than Hasek, would be the highest profile goalie Ottawa would have ever had.

4.5 to 5 might be a bargain considering what Backstrom could get around the league. we know how the Hasek thing went, but just as easily, he could have not gotten hurt and Ottawa could have put on a serious push that year as well.

Neely4Life wrote:Jesus, I dont get people... people in Ottawa are willing to wait 7 year for Spezza to come around in Ottawa, but they are not willing to wait less than 6 months for a top goaltending prospect to try and be the number 1 guy.

Ottawa always tried to short term fix with goaltending and what happens? Gerber, Hasek... Do it right, develope your number 1 guy during a REBUILD year, which next year defently is, the playoffs are still a long shot.

For once it looks like Ottawa is going to handle their goaltending situation correctly.

I'm with you. Where was Spezza in that game? Elliott should have had the luxury of allowing 4 goals and still enjoy a comfortable victory against Cujo and the Leafs. Instead he gets the loss and is made the goat.

I think the patience for Spezza stems from the fact that he is an elite level center, and the Sens have been waiting with fingers crossed that he'd grow up. They have also invested way too much money in him (granted, out of necessity).

Elliot is another in the line of backups/rookies that Ottawa has brought in to be the next "one" and nothing has worked. Patience is very thin, I would imagine

Elliot may be the "one" two or three years from now.

Neely4Life wrote:Jesus, I dont get people... people in Ottawa are willing to wait 7 year for Spezza to come around in Ottawa, but they are not willing to wait less than 6 months for a top goaltending prospect to try and be the number 1 guy.

Ottawa always tried to short term fix with goaltending and what happens? Gerber, Hasek... Do it right, develope your number 1 guy during a REBUILD year, which next year defently is, the playoffs are still a long shot.

For once it looks like Ottawa is going to handle their goaltending situation correctly.

The problem is, I think Ottawa tried to get the short-term fix with Elliot by bringing him up too early. I really think Elliot would have been much better served by playing in thr AHL all year where he was a top goalie playing on a team that was having a good year. It would have been so much better for his confidence and he would be getting more regular minutes. What good came about sending Gerber down? It only provided us with more cap space that we don't need while still hitting Melnyk's pocket at the same time.

beedub wrote:I think the patience for Spezza stems from the fact that he is an elite level center, and the Sens have been waiting with fingers crossed that he'd grow up. They have also invested way too much money in him (granted, out of necessity).

Elliot is another in the line of backups/rookies that Ottawa has brought in to be the next "one" and nothing has worked. Patience is very thin, I would imagine

Elliot may be the "one" two or three years from now.

Fact of the matter is people in Ottawa are obsessed with the names on the back of jersey's instead of the logo on the front. Ottawa fans have a "please look at us' complex. Thats why people want Spezza to stay, and thats why people want to go get the next big thing in goal.

Gerber was all the rage 3 years ago, and people who say he wasnt are liars. Everyone was excitted and then our rookie goaltender stole the job. Elliott will end up stealing the job again IMO and then we will be stuck with a 4 million dollar backup again that is impossible to trade.

Neely4Life wrote:Fact of the matter is people in Ottawa are obsessed with the names on the back of jersey's instead of the logo on the front. Ottawa fans have a "please look at us' complex. Thats why people want Spezza to stay, and thats why people want to go get the next big thing in goal.

And that's why they want us to sign/keep players because they have famous girlfriends.

Meh, I like Fisher, not a big fan of Comrie so...

Neely4Life wrote:Meh, I like Fisher, not a big fan of Comrie so...

I was just supporting your argument about the "look at me" complex. But thanks for that.

Haha, sorry, I know what you mean, I was just saying one of the two famous g/fs boyfriends, one I like, haha.

You're right though, people in Ottawa dont want to feel like they are forgotten.

504Heater wrote:

RobbyJ wrote:There is no market for Goalies right now. Vermette for Leclaire could be done in the summer if BM wants to. If Columbus really wants Vermette for the playoff run it is going to cost more than an expensive, injured backup. Everyone please stop with the Kris Russell, BM picked up Campoli so I would imagine he is no longer interested in Russell.

He's only just begun to revamp this crappy D, Russell is really, really good. I betcha he's going for him as well.

Russell would be good Heater but the Jackets aren't giving him up. He's already their best defensemen so it really wouldn't make any sense.

Urkie wrote:

504Heater wrote:

RobbyJ wrote:There is no market for Goalies right now. Vermette for Leclaire could be done in the summer if BM wants to. If Columbus really wants Vermette for the playoff run it is going to cost more than an expensive, injured backup. Everyone please stop with the Kris Russell, BM picked up Campoli so I would imagine he is no longer interested in Russell.

He's only just begun to revamp this crappy D, Russell is really, really good. I betcha he's going for him as well.

Russell would be good Heater but the Jackets aren't giving him up. He's already their best defensemen so it really wouldn't make any sense.

we all can dream, and well, stranger things have happened before, an unbelieve package might pull Russell out of CBJ, but do we want to pay that price, we need to keep our prospects/picks, not wither them away.

Neely4Life wrote:Jesus, I dont get people... people in Ottawa are willing to wait 7 year for Spezza to come around in Ottawa, but they are not willing to wait less than 6 months for a top goaltending prospect to try and be the number 1 guy.

Ottawa always tried to short term fix with goaltending and what happens? Gerber, Hasek... Do it right, develope your number 1 guy during a REBUILD year, which next year defently is, the playoffs are still a long shot.

For once it looks like Ottawa is going to handle their goaltending situation correctly.

I'm not asking for a short term fix but it may be necessary. Ever think that maybe Elliott isn't ready? Is it the right thing to force him into something he's not prepared to do? We've seen players rushed in before and it completely destroyed their careers. I don't mind giving him a taste until the end of this season but I want a goalie that's ready to be #1 next season. It may be for the best if Elliott continues to improve down in the AHL.

Urkie wrote:
Russell would be good Heater but the Jackets aren't giving him up. He's already their best defensemen so it really wouldn't make any sense.

Right now I think they need Vermette more than they need Russell though.